English is the authoritative source. Machine translation changes this website page only; it is not a professionally reviewed translation and does not translate the novel. Confirm safeguarding, legal and emergency information with an official service in your country.
More website languages →Translation and accuracy standard →Freedom Education
Forced marriage learning for professionals. Learn how to recognise concerns, respond safely and make sound safeguarding decisions.
Start with the level that best matches your role.
Start professional learning →Concern is not proof. But professionals do not need to wait for proof before following safe safeguarding procedures.
ESSENTIAL
Definition, arranged and forced marriage, under-18 law, coercion, myths, protected characteristics and specialist support.
Compare an accepted refusal with a case where refusal carries serious consequences.
Can you classify arranged, forced or not enough information without using identity as evidence?
Write the two questions your role should use to test free consent.
Private listening, immediate safety, wishes, confidentiality boundaries and no family contact or mediation.
A person discloses fear, then says their phone may be monitored.
Which first response listens, checks immediate safety and explains confidentiality honestly?
Draft the first two sentences you would use.
Accurate recording, proportionate sharing, security and avoiding gossip or unsafe contact.
Separate a direct statement, an observation, a third-party report and an inference.
What is necessary to record and share for the next safe action?
Check your recording template labels source and uncertainty.
Use organisational procedures, emergency routes and specialist advice, guided by the facts of the case.
Contrast routine escalation with immediate danger and unsafe contact risk.
Who owns the next action, and what would make the route urgent?
Confirm your current specialist and emergency routes.
PRACTITIONER
Patterns, direct information, changed behaviour, travel, surveillance and evidence versus assumption.
Review matched cases with identical facts and different cultural details.
Which information increases concern, and which information should not affect your judgement?
When discussing a case, record what is known, what has been reported and what is still uncertain.
Why delay or family involvement may close a safe opportunity; case-by-case risk assessment.
Trace how travel, dependence and monitored contact can close a safe opportunity.
Which apparently helpful action could increase risk?
Identify one change to first-contact practice.
Facts, reasons, ownership, handover, confidentiality and specialist access.
Map a handoff where agencies hold different pieces of information.
What should be shared, with whom, why and by whom?
Define ownership and a closed-loop handoff.
Offence, under-18 law, FMPOs, jurisdiction and role limits.
Compare criminal accountability, civil protection and safeguarding action.
Can you state the jurisdiction, function and limit of each?
Bookmark the current official source for your role.
New case, decision, new information, review and action plan.
Complete a new case, receive new information and reassess.
Does your rationale name evidence, uncertainty, role and safety?
Record one action, owner, deadline and review trigger.
ADVANCED
Financial, immigration, housing, digital, reputational, relational and multi-perpetrator dynamics.
Map financial, housing, immigration, digital and relational dependencies.
Which pressures interact, and what counter-evidence weakens concern?
Add cumulative coercion to supervision prompts.
Wishes, capacity concerns, adult safeguarding, role-specific duties and specialist or legal advice.
Compare a person’s wishes with a possible capacity concern.
What can your role decide, and what needs qualified assessment or advice?
Audit how agency is recorded alongside duty.
Male and LGBT+ cases, reluctant sponsors, disability, overseas risk and consular limits.
Apply one consent test across male, LGBT+, disability and cross-border cases.
Which barrier is created by the system rather than the person?
Remove one exclusionary assumption from a pathway.
Conflicting agency views, uncertain evidence, proportionality, escalation and clear reasons.
Two agencies disagree about an overt intervention.
How will risk, disagreement, decision ownership and review be recorded?
Add an escalation route for unresolved professional disagreement.
LEADERSHIP
Policy, ownership, specialist access, escalation, current guidance and review cycle.
A policy is current but staff cannot name the specialist route.
What evidence shows operational readiness?
Assign an owner and review date to each pathway dependency.
Clear outcomes, scenarios, supervision and refreshers.
Attendance is high but staff fail an ambiguous scenario.
Which behavioural outcome demonstrates capability?
Replace one completion metric with an applied check.
Review case handling, information flow, delay, family contact, outcomes and near misses.
Audit delay, unsafe contact, information flow and near misses.
Which pattern signals a system weakness rather than one-off error?
Schedule a learning review with accountable actions.
Serious-case learning, role clarity, multi-agency pathways, measures and accountability.
A serious-case review finds unclear ownership and outdated training.
Which policy, supervision and pathway changes address the conditions together?
Publish an action, owner, deadline and evidence measure internally.
Choose your role
Choose the role closest to your work to see the relevant boundaries and questions.
Selected role
Use the school or college safeguarding route, record the learner’s words, and coordinate a safe response.
Do not investigate, mediate with family or promise absolute secrecy.
What must the DSL know now, and how can the learner be contacted safely?
Practice cases
Each case asks for a first decision and reason before new information and the explanation are revealed.
Essential · 15–20 minutes
What should happen in the first ten minutes after a disclosure?
Practitioner · 20–30 minutes
Which apparently helpful action could close the only safe opportunity?
Advanced · 25–35 minutes
How should a professional respond when forced marriage, virginity testing and family pressure intersect?
Practitioner · 20–30 minutes
What can reluctance reveal without turning suspicion into fact?
Advanced · 25–35 minutes
How can gender, sexuality, family dependence and isolation affect consent?
Practitioner · 20–30 minutes
How should source and certainty shape a proportionate forced-marriage response?
Essential · 15–20 minutes
Why can family contact or mediation increase danger?
Advanced · 25–35 minutes
What changes across education, health, policing and social care?
Advanced · 20–30 minutes
When do public interest, privacy and safeguarding pull in different directions?
Leadership · 30–45 minutes
Which policy, supervision or referral failure allowed risk to grow?
