Access
Reading options
Translate this website page

English is the authoritative source. Machine translation changes this website page only; it is not a professionally reviewed translation and does not translate the novel. Confirm safeguarding, legal and emergency information with an official service in your country.

العربيةবাংলা中文Françaisहिन्दीਪੰਜਾਬੀEspañolSoomaaliاردو
More website languages →Translation and accuracy standard →

Format · Full interactive lesson

Level · FoundationFor · ages 11–13Time · 45–55 minutesProgress · Lesson 2 of 6

F2

Can You Really Say No?

You will learn to

  • Recognise simple forms of pressure.
  • Explain why the consequences of saying no matter.
  • Choose a safe response when a friend seems worried.
Start or continue

A calm fictional comparison reflects the book’s themes of pressure without reproducing graphic or personal material.

Important: fiction creates safe distance and insight. It is not evidence of prevalence.

Preparing this lesson…
Teacher View · unique guidance for F2

Prepare

Audience: Foundation, ages 11–13. Learner time 45–55 minutes; facilitated time may include discussion and pauses.

Prior learning: F1: What Makes a Choice Free?

Resources: This online lesson, a projector or individual device, optional printed scenario cards, a private question route and the current Help page. Every selection activity has a non-drag alternative.

Before you teach: Establish a no-disclosure climate, confirm the school safeguarding route and DSL readiness, explain confidentiality boundaries, and ensure nobody contacts or mediates with family where forced-marriage risk is suspected.

Teach

Purpose: Make the consequences of refusal visible and teach safe friend support.

Opening baseline: Are the two yeses equally free?

Ask: What is different about the two yeses?

Listen for: Fear, punishment, loss of housing, money, education, contact or safety.

Four distinct activities: baseline, explanatory teaching, application practice, changed-information reassessment and novel transfer.

Respond

Misconception: Only an explicit physical threat can remove free choice.

Explanatory correction: Compare what each person realistically risks if they refuse.

Protect

Safeguarding: Keep examples fictional and distanced; pupils are not safeguarding decision-makers.

Avoid: Inviting pupils to identify warning signs in classmates or promising secrecy.

Disclosure response: Thank you for telling me. I’m going to take what you’ve said seriously. I can’t promise secrecy if somebody may be unsafe. I will share only with people who need to help keep you safe.

Adapt & assess

SEND/EAL and reduced-text: Use a four-position line with button choices instead of dragging. Offer a short spoken version of each case.

Stretch: Ask how several small pressures can combine.

Evidence of learning: Emerging notices pressure; Secure links consequences to consent; Deep explains cumulative pressure and safer support.

Assessment: Emerging identifies relevant ideas; Secure applies evidence and safer help with a reason; Deep acknowledges ambiguity and revises proportionately.