Access
Reading options
Translate this website page

English is the authoritative source. Machine translation changes this website page only; it is not a professionally reviewed translation and does not translate the novel. Confirm safeguarding, legal and emergency information with an official service in your country.

العربيةবাংলা中文Françaisहिन्दीਪੰਜਾਬੀEspañolSoomaaliاردو
More website languages →Translation and accuracy standard →

Format · Full interactive lesson

Level · FoundationFor · ages 11–13Time · 50–60 minutesProgress · Lesson 5 of 6

F5

How Do You Help Without Making Things Worse?

You will learn to

  • Identify safe and unsafe helping behaviour.
  • Explain why confronting or mediating with family can increase risk.
  • Know that a trusted adult or specialist service may need to help.
Start or continue

A friend-support situation anchors the lesson before a new fictional case tests transfer.

Important: fiction creates safe distance and insight. It is not evidence of prevalence.

Preparing this lesson…
Teacher View · unique guidance for F5

Prepare

Audience: Foundation, ages 11–13. Learner time 50–60 minutes; facilitated time may include discussion and pauses.

Prior learning: F4 evidence and safe next steps.

Resources: This online lesson, a projector or individual device, optional printed scenario cards, a private question route and the current Help page. Every selection activity has a non-drag alternative.

Before you teach: Establish a no-disclosure climate, confirm the school safeguarding route and DSL readiness, explain confidentiality boundaries, and ensure nobody contacts or mediates with family where forced-marriage risk is suspected.

Teach

Purpose: Teach a memorable safe friend sequence and make the family-contact risk explicit.

Opening baseline: Which first response is safest?

Ask: What could make this worse even if the intention is kind?

Listen for: Listening, honesty, trusted adult/specialist help, no investigation and no family contact.

Four distinct activities: baseline, explanatory teaching, application practice, changed-information reassessment and novel transfer.

Respond

Misconception: A good friend should solve the problem or promise secrecy.

Explanatory correction: Separate support from rescue and explain who holds safeguarding responsibility.

Protect

Safeguarding: Pupils are not responsible for investigating or deciding the case.

Avoid: Disclosure role-play, mediation or absolute secrecy.

Disclosure response: Thank you for telling me. I’m going to take what you’ve said seriously. I can’t promise secrecy if somebody may be unsafe. I will share only with people who need to help keep you safe.

Adapt & assess

SEND/EAL and reduced-text: Use four illustrated steps and allow learners to select the next step rather than drag.

Stretch: Ask how agency can be preserved while adult help is sought.

Evidence of learning: Emerging identifies an unsafe action; Secure chooses a safe sequence; Deep explains the unintended risk of a well-meant response.

Assessment: Emerging identifies relevant ideas; Secure applies evidence and safer help with a reason; Deep acknowledges ambiguity and revises proportionately.